Neutrinet vs WG-Easy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Neutrinet
Auto renewal for the Neutrinet vpn-certificates
VS
WG-Easy
The easiest way to run WireGuard VPN with a web UI
| Feature | Neutrinet | WG-Easy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | AGPL-3.0-or-later | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | — | ★ 26,595 |
| First released | 2023 | 2021 |
| Replaces | — | OpenVPN Access Server |
Why pick each one
Choose Neutrinet if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later license
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Neutrinet or WG-Easy better?
WG-Easy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Neutrinet if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Neutrinet and WG-Easy free and open-source?
Yes. Neutrinet is licensed under AGPL-3.0-or-later and WG-Easy under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Neutrinet and WG-Easy with Docker?
Neutrinet: check the project docs for container support. WG-Easy: yes.