localtunnel vs Neutrinet
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
localtunnel
Expose your localhost to the world for testing
VS
Neutrinet
Auto renewal for the Neutrinet vpn-certificates
| Feature | localtunnel | Neutrinet |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0-or-later |
| Language | JavaScript | |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 22,440 | — |
| First released | 2015 | 2023 |
| Replaces | ngrok | — |
Why pick each one
Choose localtunnel if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 22.4k GitHub stars
Choose Neutrinet if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-or-later license
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is localtunnel or Neutrinet better?
localtunnel is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Neutrinet if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are localtunnel and Neutrinet free and open-source?
Yes. localtunnel is licensed under MIT and Neutrinet under AGPL-3.0-or-later. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run localtunnel and Neutrinet with Docker?
localtunnel: yes. Neutrinet: check the project docs for container support.