JumpServer vs WG-Easy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureJumpServerWG-Easy
CategoryRemote Access & VPNRemote Access & VPN
LicenseGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM4,096 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetesdocker
GitHub stars★ 31,230★ 26,595
First released20142021
ReplacesCyberArk, TeleportOpenVPN Access Server

Why pick each one

Choose JumpServer if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 31.2k GitHub stars
JumpServer details

Choose WG-Easy if…

  • Extremely easy setup
  • Friendly UI
WG-Easy details

Frequently asked questions

Is JumpServer or WG-Easy better?

Neither is universally better. JumpServer has the larger community, while WG-Easy is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are JumpServer and WG-Easy free and open-source?

Yes. JumpServer is licensed under GPL-3.0 and WG-Easy under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run JumpServer and WG-Easy with Docker?

JumpServer: yes. WG-Easy: yes.

Related comparisons