Aspia vs WG-Easy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Aspia
Free remote desktop and file transfer toolkit
VS
WG-Easy
The easiest way to run WireGuard VPN with a web UI
| Feature | Aspia | WG-Easy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | C++ | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,912 | ★ 26,595 |
| First released | 2016 | 2021 |
| Replaces | TeamViewer, AnyDesk | OpenVPN Access Server |
Why pick each one
Choose Aspia if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
- Written in C++
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Aspia or WG-Easy better?
WG-Easy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Aspia if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Aspia and WG-Easy free and open-source?
Yes. Aspia is licensed under GPL-3.0 and WG-Easy under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Aspia and WG-Easy with Docker?
Aspia: check the project docs for container support. WG-Easy: yes.