frp vs WG-Easy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturefrpWG-Easy
CategoryRemote Access & VPNRemote Access & VPN
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinary, dockerdocker
GitHub stars★ 108,622★ 26,595
First released20162021
ReplacesngrokOpenVPN Access Server

Why pick each one

Choose frp if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 108.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
frp details

Choose WG-Easy if…

  • Extremely easy setup
  • Friendly UI
WG-Easy details

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or WG-Easy better?

Neither is universally better. frp has the larger community, while WG-Easy is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are frp and WG-Easy free and open-source?

Yes. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and WG-Easy under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run frp and WG-Easy with Docker?

frp: yes. WG-Easy: yes.

Related comparisons