Headscale vs WG-Easy

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureHeadscaleWG-Easy
CategoryRemote Access & VPNRemote Access & VPN
LicenseBSD-3-ClauseAGPL-3.0
LanguageGoTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 42,612★ 26,595
First released20202021
ReplacesTailscaleOpenVPN Access Server

Why pick each one

Choose Headscale if…

  • Full control of coordination
  • Lightweight
Headscale details

Choose WG-Easy if…

  • Extremely easy setup
  • Friendly UI
WG-Easy details

Frequently asked questions

Is Headscale or WG-Easy better?

Neither is universally better. Headscale has the larger community, while WG-Easy is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Headscale and WG-Easy free and open-source?

Yes. Headscale is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and WG-Easy under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Headscale and WG-Easy with Docker?

Headscale: yes. WG-Easy: yes.

Related comparisons