bore vs JumpServer
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | bore | JumpServer |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Rust | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,363 | ★ 31,230 |
| First released | 2022 | 2014 |
| Replaces | ngrok | CyberArk, Teleport |
Why pick each one
Choose bore if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 11.4k GitHub stars
Choose JumpServer if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 31.2k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is bore or JumpServer better?
Neither is universally better. JumpServer has the larger community, while bore is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are bore and JumpServer free and open-source?
Yes. bore is licensed under MIT and JumpServer under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run bore and JumpServer with Docker?
bore: yes. JumpServer: yes.