frp vs JumpServer

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturefrpJumpServer
CategoryRemote Access & VPNRemote Access & VPN
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM64 MB4,096 MB
Deploymentbinary, dockerdocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 108,622★ 31,230
First released20162014
ReplacesngrokCyberArk, Teleport

Why pick each one

Choose frp if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 108.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
frp details

Choose JumpServer if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 31.2k GitHub stars
JumpServer details

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or JumpServer better?

Neither is universally better. frp has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are frp and JumpServer free and open-source?

Yes. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and JumpServer under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run frp and JumpServer with Docker?

frp: yes. JumpServer: yes.

Related comparisons