boringproxy vs JumpServer
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
boringproxy
Simple self-hosted reverse proxy and tunnel manager
VS
JumpServer
Open-source bastion host and PAM platform
| Feature | boringproxy | JumpServer |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,381 | ★ 31,230 |
| First released | 2020 | 2014 |
| Replaces | ngrok | CyberArk, Teleport |
Why pick each one
Choose boringproxy if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.4k GitHub stars)
Choose JumpServer if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 31.2k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is boringproxy or JumpServer better?
Neither is universally better. JumpServer has the larger community, while boringproxy is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are boringproxy and JumpServer free and open-source?
Yes. boringproxy is licensed under MIT and JumpServer under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run boringproxy and JumpServer with Docker?
boringproxy: yes. JumpServer: yes.