boringproxy vs frp-panel
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
boringproxy
Simple self-hosted reverse proxy and tunnel manager
VS
frp-panel
Web management panel for the frp reverse proxy
| Feature | boringproxy | frp-panel |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,381 | ★ 1,796 |
| First released | 2020 | 2023 |
| Replaces | ngrok | ngrok |
Why pick each one
Choose boringproxy if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.4k GitHub stars)
Choose frp-panel if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is boringproxy or frp-panel better?
Neither is universally better. frp-panel has the larger community, while boringproxy is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are boringproxy and frp-panel free and open-source?
Yes. boringproxy is licensed under MIT and frp-panel under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run boringproxy and frp-panel with Docker?
boringproxy: yes. frp-panel: yes.