bore vs frp-panel
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | bore | frp-panel |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Rust | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,363 | ★ 1,796 |
| First released | 2022 | 2023 |
| Replaces | ngrok | ngrok |
Why pick each one
Choose bore if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 11.4k GitHub stars
Choose frp-panel if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is bore or frp-panel better?
bore is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider frp-panel if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are bore and frp-panel free and open-source?
Yes. bore is licensed under MIT and frp-panel under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run bore and frp-panel with Docker?
bore: yes. frp-panel: yes.