SHSelfHostIndex

Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone vs Tarsnap GUI

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
BA Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone Cross-platform backup tool with deduplication and encryption VS TA Tarsnap GUI Cross-platform desktop front end for Tarsnap backups
FeatureBackblaze alt Kopia-UI StandaloneTarsnap GUI
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0BSD-2-Clause
LanguageRustC++
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 500★ 250
First released20202016
ReplacesTime Machine, BackblazeBackblaze

Why pick each one

Choose Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone details

Choose Tarsnap GUI if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in C++
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Tarsnap GUI details

Frequently asked questions

Is Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone or Tarsnap GUI better?

Neither is universally better. Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone and Tarsnap GUI free and open-source?

Yes. Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Tarsnap GUI under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone and Tarsnap GUI with Docker?

Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone: check the project docs for container support. Tarsnap GUI: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons