SHSelfHostIndex

Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone vs Deja Dup

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
BA Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone Cross-platform backup tool with deduplication and encryption VS DE Deja Dup Simple backup tool for the GNOME desktop
FeatureBackblaze alt Kopia-UI StandaloneDeja Dup
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseGPL-3.0GPL-3.0
LanguageRustVala
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary
GitHub stars★ 500★ 600
First released20202008
ReplacesTime Machine, BackblazeTime Machine, Backblaze

Why pick each one

Choose Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Rust
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone details

Choose Deja Dup if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Vala
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Deja Dup details

Frequently asked questions

Is Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone or Deja Dup better?

Neither is universally better. Deja Dup has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone and Deja Dup free and open-source?

Yes. Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Deja Dup under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone and Deja Dup with Docker?

Backblaze alt Kopia-UI Standalone: check the project docs for container support. Deja Dup: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons