Maza ad blocking vs Traefik
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | Maza ad blocking | Traefik |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Shell | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,867 | ★ 64,330 |
| First released | 2020 | 2015 |
| Replaces | — | HAProxy, AWS ELB |
Why pick each one
Choose Maza ad blocking if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
- Written in Shell
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Traefik if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 64.3k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Maza ad blocking or Traefik better?
Neither is universally better. Traefik has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Maza ad blocking and Traefik free and open-source?
Yes. Maza ad blocking is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Traefik under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Maza ad blocking and Traefik with Docker?
Maza ad blocking: check the project docs for container support. Traefik: yes.