AdGuard Home vs Maza ad blocking
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | AdGuard Home | Maza ad blocking |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 35,977 | ★ 1,867 |
| First released | 2018 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Pi-hole, NextDNS | — |
Why pick each one
Choose AdGuard Home if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 36k GitHub stars
Choose Maza ad blocking if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
- Written in Shell
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is AdGuard Home or Maza ad blocking better?
AdGuard Home is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Maza ad blocking if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are AdGuard Home and Maza ad blocking free and open-source?
Yes. AdGuard Home is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Maza ad blocking under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run AdGuard Home and Maza ad blocking with Docker?
AdGuard Home: yes. Maza ad blocking: check the project docs for container support.