acme.sh vs Maza ad blocking
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | acme.sh | Maza ad blocking |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Shell | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 47,426 | ★ 1,867 |
| First released | 2016 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Certbot | — |
Why pick each one
Choose acme.sh if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 47.4k GitHub stars
- Written in Shell
Choose Maza ad blocking if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
- Written in Shell
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is acme.sh or Maza ad blocking better?
acme.sh is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Maza ad blocking if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are acme.sh and Maza ad blocking free and open-source?
Yes. acme.sh is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Maza ad blocking under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run acme.sh and Maza ad blocking with Docker?
acme.sh: check the project docs for container support. Maza ad blocking: check the project docs for container support.