acme.sh vs Traefik

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featureacme.shTraefik
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageShellGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM32 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 47,426★ 64,330
First released20162015
ReplacesCertbotHAProxy, AWS ELB

Why pick each one

Choose acme.sh if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 47.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Shell
acme.sh details

Choose Traefik if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 64.3k GitHub stars
Traefik details

Frequently asked questions

Is acme.sh or Traefik better?

Neither is universally better. Traefik has the larger community, while acme.sh is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are acme.sh and Traefik free and open-source?

Yes. acme.sh is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Traefik under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run acme.sh and Traefik with Docker?

acme.sh: check the project docs for container support. Traefik: yes.

Related comparisons