Caddy vs Maza ad blocking

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCaddyMaza ad blocking
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoShell
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, bare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 74,748★ 1,867
First released20152020
ReplacesNginx, Apache

Why pick each one

Choose Caddy if…

  • Zero-config TLS
  • Easy to learn
Caddy details

Choose Maza ad blocking if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Shell
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Maza ad blocking details

Frequently asked questions

Is Caddy or Maza ad blocking better?

Caddy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Maza ad blocking if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Caddy and Maza ad blocking free and open-source?

Yes. Caddy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Maza ad blocking under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Caddy and Maza ad blocking with Docker?

Caddy: yes. Maza ad blocking: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons