matrix-media-repo vs Papercups
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
matrix-media-repo
Standalone media storage for Matrix homeservers
VS
Papercups
Open-source live chat and customer messaging
| Feature | matrix-media-repo | Papercups |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Elixir |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 235 | ★ 6,097 |
| First released | 2018 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Slack file storage | Intercom, Drift |
Why pick each one
Choose matrix-media-repo if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Papercups if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 6.1k GitHub stars
- Written in Elixir
Frequently asked questions
Is matrix-media-repo or Papercups better?
Papercups is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider matrix-media-repo if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are matrix-media-repo and Papercups free and open-source?
Yes. matrix-media-repo is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Papercups under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run matrix-media-repo and Papercups with Docker?
matrix-media-repo: yes. Papercups: yes.