Centrifugo vs matrix-media-repo
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Centrifugo
Scalable real-time messaging server for apps and websites
VS
matrix-media-repo
Standalone media storage for Matrix homeservers
| Feature | Centrifugo | matrix-media-repo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 10,590 | ★ 235 |
| First released | 2015 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Pusher, Firebase Realtime Database | Slack file storage |
Why pick each one
Choose matrix-media-repo if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Centrifugo or matrix-media-repo better?
Centrifugo is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider matrix-media-repo if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Centrifugo and matrix-media-repo free and open-source?
Yes. Centrifugo is licensed under MIT and matrix-media-repo under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Centrifugo and matrix-media-repo with Docker?
Centrifugo: yes. matrix-media-repo: yes.