Papercups vs Chatwoot

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePapercupsChatwoot
CategoryChat & CommunicationChat & Communication
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageElixirRuby
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, kubernetes, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 6,097★ 35,596
First released20202019
ReplacesIntercom, DriftIntercom, Zendesk, Drift

Why pick each one

Choose Papercups if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 6.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Elixir
Papercups details

Choose Chatwoot if…

  • Polished customer support workflow
  • Active development
Chatwoot details

Frequently asked questions

Is Papercups or Chatwoot better?

Neither is universally better. Chatwoot has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Papercups and Chatwoot free and open-source?

Yes. Papercups is licensed under MIT and Chatwoot under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Papercups and Chatwoot with Docker?

Papercups: yes. Chatwoot: yes.

Related comparisons