Manticore Search vs Stork
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Manticore Search
Fast, low-footprint database for search
VS
Stork
Fast, accessible static site search in WebAssembly
| Feature | Manticore Search | Stork |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | C++ | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,928 | ★ 2,758 |
| First released | 2017 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Elasticsearch, Algolia | Algolia |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Manticore Search or Stork better?
Neither is universally better. Manticore Search has the larger community, while Stork is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Manticore Search and Stork free and open-source?
Yes. Manticore Search is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Stork under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Manticore Search and Stork with Docker?
Manticore Search: yes. Stork: check the project docs for container support.