Kuma Mieru vs Statusnook
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kuma Mieru
Modern status page frontend powered by Uptime Kuma data
VS
Statusnook
Effortless self-hosted status page and monitoring dashboard
| Feature | Kuma Mieru | Statusnook |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Dashboards & Startpages |
| License | MPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 798 | ★ 976 |
| First released | 2024 | 2024 |
| Replaces | StatusPage, Instatus | StatusPage, Instatus |
Why pick each one
Choose Kuma Mieru if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Kuma Mieru or Statusnook better?
Neither is universally better. Statusnook has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Kuma Mieru and Statusnook free and open-source?
Yes. Kuma Mieru is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Statusnook under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kuma Mieru and Statusnook with Docker?
Kuma Mieru: yes. Statusnook: yes.