Kuma Mieru vs Apache SkyWalking
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kuma Mieru
Modern status page frontend powered by Uptime Kuma data
VS
Apache SkyWalking
APM and observability for cloud-native architectures
| Feature | Kuma Mieru | Apache SkyWalking |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 798 | ★ 24,915 |
| First released | 2024 | 2015 |
| Replaces | StatusPage, Instatus | New Relic, Datadog |
Why pick each one
Choose Kuma Mieru if…
- Released under the MPL-2.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in TypeScript
Choose Apache SkyWalking if…
- Full observability suite
- Strong Apache governance
Frequently asked questions
Is Kuma Mieru or Apache SkyWalking better?
Neither is universally better. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community, while Kuma Mieru is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Kuma Mieru and Apache SkyWalking free and open-source?
Yes. Kuma Mieru is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Apache SkyWalking under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kuma Mieru and Apache SkyWalking with Docker?
Kuma Mieru: yes. Apache SkyWalking: yes.