InfluxDB vs Kuma Mieru

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureInfluxDBKuma Mieru
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMITMPL-2.0
LanguageRustTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 31,683★ 798
First released20132024
ReplacesDatadog, AWS TimestreamStatusPage, Instatus

Why pick each one

Choose InfluxDB if…

  • Excellent for IoT and metrics
  • Rich tooling and integrations
InfluxDB details

Choose Kuma Mieru if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in TypeScript
Kuma Mieru details

Frequently asked questions

Is InfluxDB or Kuma Mieru better?

Neither is universally better. InfluxDB has the larger community, while Kuma Mieru is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are InfluxDB and Kuma Mieru free and open-source?

Yes. InfluxDB is licensed under MIT and Kuma Mieru under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run InfluxDB and Kuma Mieru with Docker?

InfluxDB: yes. Kuma Mieru: yes.

Related comparisons