Grafana vs Kuma Mieru

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafanaKuma Mieru
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0MPL-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, helmdocker
GitHub stars★ 76,153★ 798
First released20142024
ReplacesDatadogStatusPage, Instatus

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana if…

  • Beautiful flexible dashboards
  • Broad data source support
  • Strong community
Grafana details

Choose Kuma Mieru if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in TypeScript
Kuma Mieru details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana or Kuma Mieru better?

Neither is universally better. Grafana has the larger community, while Kuma Mieru is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Grafana and Kuma Mieru free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Kuma Mieru under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana and Kuma Mieru with Docker?

Grafana: yes. Kuma Mieru: yes.

Related comparisons