Grafana k6 vs Apache SkyWalking

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGrafana k6Apache SkyWalking
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoJava
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM256 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, bare-metaldocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 31,211★ 24,915
First released20172015
ReplacesLoadRunner, BlazeMeterNew Relic, Datadog

Why pick each one

Choose Grafana k6 if…

  • Developer-friendly scripting
  • Great CI integration
Grafana k6 details

Choose Apache SkyWalking if…

  • Full observability suite
  • Strong Apache governance
Apache SkyWalking details

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana k6 or Apache SkyWalking better?

Grafana k6 is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Apache SkyWalking if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Grafana k6 and Apache SkyWalking free and open-source?

Yes. Grafana k6 is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Apache SkyWalking under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Grafana k6 and Apache SkyWalking with Docker?

Grafana k6: yes. Apache SkyWalking: yes.

Related comparisons