Kuma Mieru vs Prometheus

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKuma MieruPrometheus
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseMPL-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, binary, helm
GitHub stars★ 798★ 65,616
First released20242015
ReplacesStatusPage, InstatusDatadog

Why pick each one

Choose Kuma Mieru if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in TypeScript
Kuma Mieru details

Choose Prometheus if…

  • Powerful query language
  • Reliable and scalable
  • Huge ecosystem
Prometheus details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kuma Mieru or Prometheus better?

Neither is universally better. Prometheus has the larger community, while Kuma Mieru is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Kuma Mieru and Prometheus free and open-source?

Yes. Kuma Mieru is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Prometheus under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kuma Mieru and Prometheus with Docker?

Kuma Mieru: yes. Prometheus: yes.

Related comparisons