Krystal DMS vs OpenDocMan
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Krystal DMS
Web-based document management system in Java
VS
OpenDocMan
Free web-based document management system in PHP
| Feature | Krystal DMS | OpenDocMan |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Java | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | bare-metal, docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 50 | ★ 281 |
| First released | 2012 | 2004 |
| Replaces | DocuWare | DocuWare, M-Files |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Krystal DMS or OpenDocMan better?
Neither is universally better. OpenDocMan has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Krystal DMS and OpenDocMan free and open-source?
Yes. Krystal DMS is licensed under GPL-3.0 and OpenDocMan under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Krystal DMS and OpenDocMan with Docker?
Krystal DMS: check the project docs for container support. OpenDocMan: yes.