Krystal DMS vs Mayan EDMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Krystal DMS
Web-based document management system in Java
VS
Mayan EDMS
Free electronic document management with workflows
| Feature | Krystal DMS | Mayan EDMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Java | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 50 | ★ 1,100 |
| First released | 2012 | 2011 |
| Replaces | DocuWare | DocuWare, M-Files |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Krystal DMS or Mayan EDMS better?
Neither is universally better. Mayan EDMS has the larger community, while Krystal DMS is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Krystal DMS and Mayan EDMS free and open-source?
Yes. Krystal DMS is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Mayan EDMS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Krystal DMS and Mayan EDMS with Docker?
Krystal DMS: check the project docs for container support. Mayan EDMS: yes.