Aleph vs Krystal DMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted document management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Aleph
Search and document management for investigative work
VS
Krystal DMS
Web-based document management system in Java
| Feature | Aleph | Krystal DMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Document Management | Document Management |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,412 | ★ 50 |
| First released | 2016 | 2012 |
| Replaces | DocuWare, Relativity | DocuWare |
Why pick each one
Choose Aleph if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Aleph or Krystal DMS better?
Neither is universally better. Aleph has the larger community, while Krystal DMS is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Aleph and Krystal DMS free and open-source?
Yes. Aleph is licensed under MIT and Krystal DMS under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Aleph and Krystal DMS with Docker?
Aleph: yes. Krystal DMS: check the project docs for container support.