Kinto vs Supabase
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kinto
Generic JSON document store with built-in synchronization
VS
Supabase
Open-source Firebase alternative
| Feature | Kinto | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | Self-Hosting Platforms (PaaS) |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,417 | ★ 107,678 |
| First released | 2015 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Firebase | Firebase |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Kinto or Supabase better?
Neither is universally better. Supabase has the larger community, while Kinto is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Kinto and Supabase free and open-source?
Yes. Kinto is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Supabase under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kinto and Supabase with Docker?
Kinto: yes. Supabase: yes.