Directus vs Kinto
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Directus
Instant REST and GraphQL API for any SQL database
VS
Kinto
Generic JSON document store with built-in synchronization
| Feature | Directus | Kinto |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Self-Hosting Platforms (PaaS) | File Sync & Storage |
| License | BSL-1.1 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 37,238 | ★ 4,417 |
| First released | 2015 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Contentful, Firebase | Firebase |
Why pick each one
Choose Directus if…
- Released under the BSL-1.1 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 37.2k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Directus or Kinto better?
Neither is universally better. Directus has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Directus and Kinto free and open-source?
Yes. Directus is licensed under BSL-1.1 and Kinto under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Directus and Kinto with Docker?
Directus: yes. Kinto: yes.