Convex vs Kinto
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Convex
Open-source reactive backend with a TypeScript database
VS
Kinto
Generic JSON document store with built-in synchronization
| Feature | Convex | Kinto |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools & Git | File Sync & Storage |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 12,332 | ★ 4,417 |
| First released | 2024 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Firebase | Firebase |
Why pick each one
Choose Convex if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 12.3k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Convex or Kinto better?
Neither is universally better. Convex has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Convex and Kinto free and open-source?
Yes. Convex is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Kinto under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Convex and Kinto with Docker?
Convex: yes. Kinto: yes.