File Browser vs Kinto

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserKinto
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 4,417
First released20172015
ReplacesDropboxFirebase

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose Kinto if…

  • Simple HTTP API
  • Good for app backends
Kinto details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or Kinto better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Kinto if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and Kinto free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Kinto under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and Kinto with Docker?

File Browser: yes. Kinto: yes.

Related comparisons