croc vs Kinto

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturecrocKinto
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM32 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinarydocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 39,485★ 4,417
First released20182015
ReplacesWeTransfer, AirDropFirebase

Why pick each one

Choose croc if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 39.5k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
croc details

Choose Kinto if…

  • Simple HTTP API
  • Good for app backends
Kinto details

Frequently asked questions

Is croc or Kinto better?

croc is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Kinto if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are croc and Kinto free and open-source?

Yes. croc is licensed under MIT and Kinto under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run croc and Kinto with Docker?

croc: check the project docs for container support. Kinto: yes.

Related comparisons