Keystone vs Payload CMS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKeystonePayload CMS
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 9,938★ 44,043
First released20132021
ReplacesContentful, StrapiContentful, Sanity

Why pick each one

Choose Keystone if…

  • Strong TypeScript support
  • Flexible and extensible
Keystone details

Choose Payload CMS if…

  • Excellent TypeScript developer experience
  • No vendor lock-in
Payload CMS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Keystone or Payload CMS better?

Neither is universally better. Payload CMS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Keystone and Payload CMS free and open-source?

Yes. Keystone is licensed under MIT and Payload CMS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Keystone and Payload CMS with Docker?

Keystone: yes. Payload CMS: yes.

Related comparisons