Cockpit Next vs Payload CMS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Cockpit Next
Headless content platform for any front end
VS
Payload CMS
TypeScript-native headless CMS and application framework
| Feature | Cockpit Next | Payload CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | PHP | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source, docker | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 743 | ★ 44,043 |
| First released | 2021 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Contentful, Strapi | Contentful, Sanity |
Why pick each one
Choose Cockpit Next if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose Payload CMS if…
- Excellent TypeScript developer experience
- No vendor lock-in
Frequently asked questions
Is Cockpit Next or Payload CMS better?
Neither is universally better. Payload CMS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Cockpit Next and Payload CMS free and open-source?
Yes. Cockpit Next is licensed under MIT and Payload CMS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Cockpit Next and Payload CMS with Docker?
Cockpit Next: yes. Payload CMS: yes.