SHSelfHostIndex

Keystone vs Plasmic

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
KE Keystone Headless CMS framework with a powerful GraphQL API VS PL Plasmic Visual builder and headless CMS for web apps
FeatureKeystonePlasmic
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, sourcedocker, source
GitHub stars★ 9,938★ 6,945
First released20132021
ReplacesContentful, StrapiWebflow, Contentful

Why pick each one

Choose Keystone if…

  • Strong TypeScript support
  • Flexible and extensible
Keystone details

Choose Plasmic if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 6.9k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Plasmic details

Frequently asked questions

Is Keystone or Plasmic better?

Keystone is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Plasmic if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Keystone and Plasmic free and open-source?

Yes. Keystone is licensed under MIT and Plasmic under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Keystone and Plasmic with Docker?

Keystone: yes. Plasmic: yes.

Related comparisons