SHSelfHostIndex

Conduit File Sync vs Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
CO Conduit File Sync Lightweight folder synchronization for small teams VS RE Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare Anonymous file sharing over the Tor network
FeatureConduit File SyncResilio Sync alternative Onionshare
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageGoPython
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 7,221★ 7,055
First released20132014
ReplacesDropboxWeTransfer, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose Conduit File Sync if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 7.2k GitHub stars
Conduit File Sync details

Choose Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 7.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare details

Frequently asked questions

Is Conduit File Sync or Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare better?

Conduit File Sync is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Conduit File Sync and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare free and open-source?

Yes. Conduit File Sync is licensed under MIT and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Conduit File Sync and Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare with Docker?

Conduit File Sync: yes. Resilio Sync alternative Onionshare: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons