Kanidm vs node-oidc-provider
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kanidm
Modern, simple and secure identity management server
VS
node-oidc-provider
Certified OpenID Connect and OAuth 2.0 provider for Node.js
| Feature | Kanidm | node-oidc-provider |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Rust | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | source, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,214 | ★ 3,788 |
| First released | 2019 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Active Directory, Okta | Auth0, Okta |
Why pick each one
Choose node-oidc-provider if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Kanidm or node-oidc-provider better?
Kanidm is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider node-oidc-provider if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Kanidm and node-oidc-provider free and open-source?
Yes. Kanidm is licensed under MPL-2.0 and node-oidc-provider under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kanidm and node-oidc-provider with Docker?
Kanidm: yes. node-oidc-provider: yes.