FusionAuth vs node-oidc-provider

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFusionAuthnode-oidc-provider
CategoryIdentity & SSOIdentity & SSO
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageDockerfileJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM1,024 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, bare-metalsource, docker
GitHub stars★ 241★ 3,788
First released20182016
ReplacesAuth0, OktaAuth0, Okta

Why pick each one

Choose FusionAuth if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Written in Dockerfile
FusionAuth details

Choose node-oidc-provider if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
node-oidc-provider details

Frequently asked questions

Is FusionAuth or node-oidc-provider better?

Neither is universally better. node-oidc-provider has the larger community, while FusionAuth is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are FusionAuth and node-oidc-provider free and open-source?

Yes. FusionAuth is licensed under Apache-2.0 and node-oidc-provider under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FusionAuth and node-oidc-provider with Docker?

FusionAuth: yes. node-oidc-provider: yes.

Related comparisons