Authgear vs node-oidc-provider

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureAuthgearnode-oidc-provider
CategoryIdentity & SSOIdentity & SSO
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyHardHard
Min. RAM1,024 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetessource, docker
GitHub stars★ 1,951★ 3,788
First released20212016
ReplacesAuth0, Firebase AuthAuth0, Okta

Why pick each one

Choose Authgear if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Active community (2k GitHub stars)
Authgear details

Choose node-oidc-provider if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
node-oidc-provider details

Frequently asked questions

Is Authgear or node-oidc-provider better?

Neither is universally better. node-oidc-provider has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Authgear and node-oidc-provider free and open-source?

Yes. Authgear is licensed under Apache-2.0 and node-oidc-provider under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Authgear and node-oidc-provider with Docker?

Authgear: yes. node-oidc-provider: yes.

Related comparisons