Dex vs Kanidm
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Dex
OpenID Connect identity provider with pluggable connectors
VS
Kanidm
Modern, simple and secure identity management server
| Feature | Dex | Kanidm |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,019 | ★ 5,214 |
| First released | 2016 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Okta, Auth0 | Active Directory, Okta |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Dex or Kanidm better?
Neither is universally better. Dex has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Dex and Kanidm free and open-source?
Yes. Dex is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Kanidm under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Dex and Kanidm with Docker?
Dex: yes. Kanidm: yes.