SHSelfHostIndex

Apache Syncope vs Kanidm

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
AP Apache Syncope Open-source system for managing digital identities VS KA Kanidm Modern, simple and secure identity management server
FeatureApache SyncopeKanidm
CategoryIdentity & SSOIdentity & SSO
LicenseApache-2.0MPL-2.0
LanguageJavaRust
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, bare-metaldocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 336★ 5,214
First released20122019
ReplacesSailPoint, OktaActive Directory, Okta

Why pick each one

Choose Apache Syncope if…

  • Strong identity governance features
  • Standards based
Apache Syncope details

Choose Kanidm if…

  • Memory safe and lightweight
  • Excellent passwordless support
Kanidm details

Frequently asked questions

Is Apache Syncope or Kanidm better?

Kanidm is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Apache Syncope if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Apache Syncope and Kanidm free and open-source?

Yes. Apache Syncope is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Kanidm under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Apache Syncope and Kanidm with Docker?

Apache Syncope: yes. Kanidm: yes.

Related comparisons