Jirafeau vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureJirafeauSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0-onlyApache-2.0
LanguageGo
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM50 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 33,952
First released20232015
ReplacesImageShack, ImgurAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Jirafeau if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0-only license
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Jirafeau details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Jirafeau or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Jirafeau is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Jirafeau and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Jirafeau is licensed under AGPL-3.0-only and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Jirafeau and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Jirafeau: check the project docs for container support. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons