Lutim vs Jirafeau
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Lutim
Privacy-focused image hosting with auto-expiration
VS
Jirafeau
Upload a file in a simple way and give a unique link to it
| Feature | Lutim | Jirafeau |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Photo Management | File Sync & Storage |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0-only |
| Language | Perl | |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 300 | — |
| First released | 2015 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Imgur | ImageShack, Imgur |
Why pick each one
Choose Jirafeau if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-only license
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Lutim or Jirafeau better?
Lutim is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Jirafeau if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Lutim and Jirafeau free and open-source?
Yes. Lutim is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Jirafeau under AGPL-3.0-only. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Lutim and Jirafeau with Docker?
Lutim: yes. Jirafeau: check the project docs for container support.