Chibisafe vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureChibisafeSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 2,748★ 33,952
First released20192015
ReplacesImgur, DropboxAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose Chibisafe if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.7k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Chibisafe details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Chibisafe or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community, while Chibisafe is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Chibisafe and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. Chibisafe is licensed under MIT and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Chibisafe and SeaweedFS with Docker?

Chibisafe: yes. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons