File Browser vs Jirafeau

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile BrowserJirafeau
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0-only
LanguageGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB50 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybare-metal
GitHub stars★ 35,800
First released20172023
ReplacesDropboxImageShack, Imgur

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose Jirafeau if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0-only license
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Jirafeau details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or Jirafeau better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Jirafeau if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and Jirafeau free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Jirafeau under AGPL-3.0-only. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and Jirafeau with Docker?

File Browser: yes. Jirafeau: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons