Jirafeau vs PictShare
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Jirafeau
Upload a file in a simple way and give a unique link to it
VS
PictShare
Self-hosted image and media sharing with resizing
| Feature | Jirafeau | PictShare |
|---|---|---|
| Category | File Sync & Storage | Photo Management |
| License | AGPL-3.0-only | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | — | ★ 945 |
| First released | 2023 | 2014 |
| Replaces | ImageShack, Imgur | Imgur |
Why pick each one
Choose Jirafeau if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0-only license
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Jirafeau or PictShare better?
PictShare is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Jirafeau if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Jirafeau and PictShare free and open-source?
Yes. Jirafeau is licensed under AGPL-3.0-only and PictShare under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Jirafeau and PictShare with Docker?
Jirafeau: check the project docs for container support. PictShare: yes.